Me ham law thought in head now. You listen.

Me rake lawn clipping today. When not talking and laughing to me, me think about Obamacare.

Court say it legal because it a tax. No one say direct tax, so must be only other kind, indirect tax.

Indirect tax a tax on activity. Active. Being active make you pay money.

Indirect tax necessarily imply avenue of avoidance. Just change activity or not be active at all.

Law talker say not be active is still active, that why can tax not doing anything. Sound cuckoo to me, but this America.

All indirect tax ham avenue of avoidance. It part of definition of indirect tax. Us know that.

But law talker say can be no avenue of avoidance. Even no activity same as activity.

But all indirect tax ham avenue of avoidance. Therefore Obamacare not a tax, indirect or otherwise.

So if not a tax, on which rationale robe man say it legal, why robe man say it a tax?

Him not know what tax is? Why him talkee law? Him need credit hour?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s