Me rake lawn clipping today. When not talking and laughing to me, me think about Obamacare.
Court say it legal because it a tax. No one say direct tax, so must be only other kind, indirect tax.
Indirect tax a tax on activity. Active. Being active make you pay money.
Indirect tax necessarily imply avenue of avoidance. Just change activity or not be active at all.
Law talker say not be active is still active, that why can tax not doing anything. Sound cuckoo to me, but this America.
All indirect tax ham avenue of avoidance. It part of definition of indirect tax. Us know that.
But law talker say can be no avenue of avoidance. Even no activity same as activity.
But all indirect tax ham avenue of avoidance. Therefore Obamacare not a tax, indirect or otherwise.
So if not a tax, on which rationale robe man say it legal, why robe man say it a tax?
Him not know what tax is? Why him talkee law? Him need credit hour?